agentsclimarketplace

Scholarly citation

Skill alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/.claude/skills/scholarly-citation

Harness engineering applied to knowledge production: a self-evolving multi-agent newsroom that turns your documents into a cross-linked markdown wiki. A "reground" loop pulls published pages back in before they go stale — writer ≠ reviewer, local-first, a structured alternative to RAG.

Install
npx -y skills add alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom --skill scholarly-citation

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Verifiable-attribution and citation-discipline craft — atomic claim decomposition, evidence grading (primary/analysis/forecast tiers), claimant attribution, citation typing (cites/references/contradicts/defines), source anchoring (Xanadu). Use when writing or reviewing a reference or synthesis page that attributes and cites source-based claims so they stay traceable, or when claim attribution, citation typing, or evidence grading is needed.

SKILL.md

6.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

scholarly-citation

Verifiable-attribution craft drawn from scholarly/scientific citation traditions (citation classification, typing, anchoring). It ensures every claim in this wiki is atomized, evidence-graded, attributed to a speaker, typed by citation meaning, and anchored to a source location — and therefore traceable. Unlike the three borrowed traditions (narrative, exec summary, encyclopedic neutrality), this craft synthesizes external sources into an atomic-claim schema and is the project's signature. criteria.json is the SoT for each criterion's definition, comparator, and source; wiki-global state (page existence·hub type·section titles) is injected by the orchestrator (tools/_lint/source.py). The schema literals (## Key Claims, [fact], cites: etc.) are the wiki's actual schema markers and section headers.

Claim atomization & grading (cit.grade-marker · cit.atomic · cit.composite-split)

One claim, one line, one utterance. Each line of ## Key Claims (Key Claims) marks an evidence grade — [fact] (primary source), [analysis] (secondary analysis), [forecast] (forecast). Putting two subjects' claims on one line (joined by "and"/"&" or a comma series spanning two hubs; ko: the conjunctions 와/및), or chaining verb phrases on one line ("…did, and …did"; ko: ~했고, ~했다), breaks atomicity.

Claimant attribution (cit.claimant-link · cit.claimant-valid · cit.speaker-link)

Every claim is bound to who said it. A [[claimant]] wikilink right after the grade marker names the speaker; anonymous subjects ("the government"·"industry sources"; ko 정부는·업계에서는) are forbidden (WP:ASF — "avoid stating opinions as facts"; attribute them to a named source). A blockquote carries a speaker-attribution wikilink (APA author-date principle — identify the cited author). The attribution target must exist as a real page.

Citation typing (cit.cite-type · cit.cite-distribution · cit.cite-type-hub)

Each line of ## Connections (Connections) types the citation's meaning — cites: (direct grounds)·references: (context)·contradicts: (dispute)·defines: (definition). This extends scite Smart Citations' Supporting / Mentioning / Contrasting classes (with defines: added). If every line collapses to the default-safe references:, that signals avoidance of meaning classification. defines: points only to a concept hub.

Source anchoring (cit.anchor · cit.anchor-valid)

An external-evidence citation anchors to the source's section — [[slug#section]] (ko: [[slug#섹션]]). This applies Xanadu citation anchoring (visible links to the precise source location, Ted Nelson) at the source level; a gradual migration, so 0% still passes (advisory), but the anchor target's slug and section must exist.

Synthesis citation integrity (cit.cite-consistency · cit.grounding · cit.anchor-evidence)

A piece synthesizing many sources follows Select→Read→Cite discipline — the declared source set (frontmatter) is the top set, and both the sources read and the sources cited in the body are subsets of it.

  • cit.cite-consistency — every source cited in the body is registered in the declared source list (body ⊆ declaration). Citing an undeclared source is an editorial slip (omission).
  • cit.grounding — a source offered as representative evidence must actually be read and used. When at least one of the source's direct-quote / key-claim items appears in the body as a substring, that is objective evidence of having read it (writing from a one-line summary by memory/guess risks divergence from the source). The deterministic lint blocks only the "never read at all" extreme; full read-through rests on editor self-discipline.
  • cit.anchor-evidence — when a direct quote is placed in representative evidence, mark the citation location with a source section anchor ([[slug#section]]; ko [[slug#섹션]]) — the same Xanadu principle applied to synthesis evidence. A gradual migration, so advisory.

Schema meta-use (cit.grade-meta · cit.cite-type-meta)

The synthesizing piece's narrative consciously reflects the evidence-grade ([fact]·[analysis]·[forecast]) and citation-type (cites:·references:·contradicts:·defines:) schema attached to sources — noting which grades the evidence base rests on, the dominant claimant, strong coupling (cites) vs context (references) — to deepen attribution. Confine attribution strength to factual statements; do not let it spill into verdict conclusions. Deterministic measurement (count_grade_meta·count_cite_type_meta) counts grade/cite-type meta expressions as advisory.

Sources

Each URL points to the relevant page as of the last verification.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.