Architecture rfc review
Skill alexzhu0/agent-ready-skills/skills/architecture-rfc-review
Ten practical AI-agent skills for turning messy work into clear context, evals, reviews, and launch-ready artifacts.
npx -y skills add alexzhu0/agent-ready-skills --skill architecture-rfc-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when reviewing architecture RFCs, system design docs, diagrams, proposals, or technical decision records for tradeoffs, missing constraints, risk, and decision readiness.
SKILL.md
1.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Architecture RFC Review
Purpose
Review architecture proposals for clarity, risk, tradeoffs, and readiness to decide.
Fit
- Use when a technical proposal needs a decision-quality review before implementation.
- Do not use when the task is only code style cleanup or a small isolated bug fix.
Inputs
- RFC, design doc, diagram, ADR, or proposal.
- Requirements, constraints, scale expectations, and non-goals if available.
- Existing system boundaries or migration context.
Workflow
- Restate the proposal in one paragraph.
- Identify assumptions, constraints, and missing requirements.
- Review tradeoffs across reliability, operability, cost, security, and complexity.
- List decision blockers separately from nice-to-have improvements.
- Recommend approve, revise, reject, or spike with rationale.
Output
Produce Markdown with:
- Proposal Summary
- Strengths
- Risks And Tradeoffs
- Missing Information
- Decision Blockers
- Recommendation
- Follow-Up Checks
Validation
- Critique is tied to the actual proposal.
- Alternatives are not invented unless clearly labeled.
- Decision blockers are distinct from polish.
- Recommendation includes confidence.
- Operational and security concerns are considered.