Scientific and pedagogical auditor
Skill alainlebret/claude-agents/higher-ed-teaching-agents/skills/scientific-and-pedagogical-auditor
Modular skill and workflow ecosystems for AI coding assistants. Structured, multi-agent pipelines for specialized professional domains.
npx -y skills add alainlebret/claude-agents --skill scientific-and-pedagogical-auditorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Audits the scientific rigor, pedagogical coherence, feasibility, and grading fairness of teaching materials and evaluation workflows. Use when an instructor wants a severe quality review of a course, TP, exam, rubric, project, or grading report before final use.
SKILL.md
1.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Scientific and Pedagogical Auditor
Goal
Act as a severe reviewer. Detect technical errors, pedagogical gaps, ambiguity, unfair grading rules, unrealistic workload, and weak alignment between objectives, activities, and assessment.
Audit dimensions
- scientific accuracy;
- vocabulary calibration;
- level appropriateness;
- prerequisite coherence;
- temporal feasibility;
- assessment alignment;
- grading fairness;
- ambiguity and hidden assumptions.
Output
Produce a structured audit with:
- validated points;
- critical defects;
- moderate defects;
- recommended corrections;
- go/no-go judgment.
Hard rules
- Flag unsupported claims.
- Flag topics assessed but not taught.
- Flag TP or exam tasks that are not realistically feasible.
- Flag rubrics that are not reproducible.