agentsclimarketplace

Test review

Skill akovalion/paranoid-qa/skills/test-review

Review of just-written or modified autotests against TypeScript + Playwright best practices (per official documentation) and your project's conventions. Use via /test-review or after writing/editing any test (UI E2E, API, UI+API, mocks, visual, mobile) or a Page Object/fixture/constants — before commit. Produces a prioritized list of findings with severity, line references, and ready-made fixes.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add akovalion/paranoid-qa --skill test-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 10 stars10 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

19.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Autotest review (TypeScript + Playwright)

Check just-written or modified test code against best practices and produce a prioritized list of findings with fixes. Rule source — the official Playwright documentation (best-practices, locators, test-assertions) and TypeScript + the specific project's conventions.

Source of truth for the project — its root CLAUDE.md (if present) and the style of neighboring code. This skill is the review phase: it complements project rules, it does not replace them. Expanded ❌ before → ✅ after examples and source links for each rule — in references/rules-catalog.md.


When to apply and operating mode

  • Default mode — diagnostics. Read the code, run static analysis, produce a report. Do not edit files until the user explicitly asks to "apply / fix". Then — iteratively, one change at a time with a run in between (no big-bang rewrite of a working test).
  • Scope — only new/changed code, not the whole suite. Default — uncommitted changes (git status + git diff). If the user specified a file/directory — review those.
  • Any test type: UI E2E, API, UI+API, visual regression, mobile, mocks, plus Page Objects, fixtures, constants.
  • Do not drift into autonomous actions beyond the review (browser reproduction, running the whole suite, edits) without confirmation — the default task is "read and assess".

Evidence discipline (no hallucinations)

  • Every finding — from an actually read line (file:line) or from observed output of typecheck / lint / a run. Do not invent violations "by analogy" and do not reference lines you have not seen.
  • A rule is checkable by a tool (tsc, ESLint, a run) → run the tool first, then report its output, not "probably present".
  • Not sure it is a defect rather than a deliberate project decision → mark it "questionable", do not assert. Cross-check against the project's CLAUDE.md and neighboring code: some "anti-patterns" may be intentional (legacy helpers, non-standard markup, deliberate rule exceptions). File names/endpoints/selectors from memory and past context are background — re-verify against live code.
  • Found no violations in a category — say so: "clean", do not invent a finding for volume.

Process

  1. Scope. Determine the files under review: git status --short + git diff --name-only (include untracked), or the paths provided. For each spec, find the related Page Objects, constants, fixtures.
  2. Context. Read the changed files + related POM/constants/fixtures. Read a neighboring spec in the same directory as a style reference. Cross-check the directory/suite rules (smoke / regress / api etc.) against the project's CLAUDE.md, if present.
  3. Static analysis (mandatory — cheap and evidence-based):
    • Typecheck: tsc --noEmit (or the project's typecheck script from package.json). Any type error in new code = 🔴 Blocker.
    • ESLint: find the project config and read which rules are actually enabled (especially from eslint-plugin-playwright) — do not assume from memory. Lint output is the source of truth.
    • What lint actually catches — a two-level check. (1) No eslint-plugin-playwright at all → floating promises, manual asserts and networkidle are invisible; suggest enabling recommended. (2) Recommended is on → missing-playwright-await, prefer-web-first-assertions, no-networkidle are already errors and get caught, but no-wait-for-timeout, no-force-option and expect-expect are only warn there (verified against v2.10.5) — without --max-warnings 0 these warnings never fail CI. Suggest raising them to error. @typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises needs type-aware linting — rarely enabled. Whatever lint still misses — verify manually (A/C/H).
    • If needed — a formatting check (Prettier), if configured in the project.
  4. Checklist. Go through categories A–J below + K (your project's rules). For each violation — severity + file:line + fix. Deeper per rule — references/rules-catalog.md.
  5. Stability verification (only if the user asks to confirm the test works and a sandbox is available): run only this test in the project's native parallelism (NOT --workers=1):
    npx playwright test <file> --grep "<id>" --project="<projectName>" --retries=0 --repeat-each=5
    
    Pass-on-retry or a floating result = flake = 🟠 Major; fix the cause (races/hydration/waits), do not hide it behind retries.
  6. Report — in the format from the "Report format" section.

Severity

LabelMeaningTypical examples
🔴 BlockerTest is broken, non-deterministic, or masks a bug. Do not merge.Typecheck error; missing await (floating promise); waitForTimeout/in-page setTimeout pause; pass only on retry; { force: true } / dispatchEvent / direct setter bypassing the real UI; test without asserts; test.only; conditional expect that may never execute.
🟠 MajorBrittleness or flake on content/environment change; violation of a key project rule.CSS/XPath chains instead of role/label; instant count()/isVisible()/allTextContents() as a gate; exact prices/texts/dates instead of regex; project convention violation (importing base @playwright/test where the project requires a custom fixture; a mandatory project check skipped — e.g. the network error monitor); waitForLoadState('networkidle'); a test depends on another test's state.
🟡 MinorStyle/readability/maintainability; no impact on stability.No test.step for business steps; inline comments instead of self-documentation; .nth() where .filter() fits; a working but non-priority locator; unused import/constant.
⚪ NitCosmetics.Naming, import order, formatting (if not caught by Prettier).

Review checklist

Each item — what to look for; the violation's severity in parentheses. Expanded examples and proofs — in the catalog.

A. Determinism, waits, asynchrony

  • No page.waitForTimeout(ms) and no setTimeout/sleep inside page.evaluate (grep for both). Wait for state, not time. (🔴)
  • No floating promises: every expect, test.step, action (click/fill/goto), waitFor* — under await/return/void. A missing await = silent flake. (🔴)
  • Network — the promise → action → await pattern: const p = page.waitForResponse(...); await click(); await p. Declaring after the action = race. (🔴)
  • No waitForLoadState('networkidle'). Navigation — goto(url, { waitUntil: 'domcontentloaded' }), without a duplicate waitForLoadState right after. (🟠)
  • Derived/compound checks (several related conditions, measuring a collection right after it appears) — in await expect(async () => {...}).toPass({ timeout }), not a chain of awaits. (🟠)
  • SSR hydration accounted for: SSR frameworks (Nuxt/Next etc.) can remount content after hydration → an instant count()/allTextContents() right after appearance hits the emptiness window. Measure via toPass. (🟠)

B. Locators

  • Priority: getByRole({ name }) → getByText → getByLabel → getByPlaceholder → getByAltText → getByTitle → getByTestId → CSS (last resort) → XPath (almost never). (🟠 for CSS/XPath without a reason)
  • No brittle CSS chains tied to DOM structure (div > div > span, .episode-actions-later). They break on rebranding. (🟠)
  • Strict mode: the locator resolves to a single element; narrow via { name } / .filter({ hasText }) / .filter({ has }), not .nth(). .nth() — only with justification. (🟡)
  • Floating elements (dropdowns, toasts, modals, portal content, iframes) are located globally from page, not from a section. (🟠)
  • A long getByText('whole sentence') is not used as an anchor — brittle to copy edits; take a stable fragment/role. (🟡)

C. Assertions

  • Only web-first (auto-retrying): toBeVisible/toHaveText/toHaveCount/toHaveValue/toBeChecked/toHaveAttribute/toHaveURL. No expect(await loc.isVisible()).toBe(true) and expect(await loc.count()).toBe(n) — they do not retry. (🔴/🟠)
  • Every test verifies something (no test that only clicks without an expect). (🔴)
  • A block of independent checks for one section — via expect.soft, to collect all failures at once. (🟡)
  • No asserts on exact prices/numbers/dates/dynamic content — regex or a range. (🟠)
  • A known open bug — test.fail() (with the single bug assert), not test.fixme(); the working behavior — as a separate regular test. (🟡)

D. Isolation and independence

  • Tests are independent: state is NOT passed between tests. let x at describe level, reinitialized in beforeEach, is a common valid pattern; the violation is a test reading another test's result. Must pass in isolation and in any order. (🔴 if isolation is broken)
  • describe.configure({ mode: 'serial' }) — only for a real dependency, not "just in case". (🟠)
  • Setup/teardown — in beforeEach/fixtures, no copy-paste; created entities (API) are deleted. (🟠)
  • The test does not depend on external sites and third-party widgets — test only what you control; for the external part — mock/verify the request was made. (🟠)

E. TypeScript and lint

  • Typecheck green for new code (tsc --noEmit, strict). (🔴)
  • any in POM / fixtures / utils — undesirable, type it (Locator/Page/Route/APIResponse). Cross-check the project config: any may be deliberately allowed in specs (e.g. for mock data) — do not flag it there. @ts-ignore — only with a reason/ticket. (🟠 for POM/utils)
  • POM fields — readonly Locator; fixtures typed (base.extend<{...}>); type the API response body explicitly if asserts rely on it. (🟡)
  • A missing await is often NOT caught by lint (check the config: is no-floating-promises / missing-playwright-await there; valid-expect covers only part) → re-read by eye, see A2. (🔴)
  • Match the module system (ESM vs CJS) and import style (relative vs aliases) against the project's actual code — follow the existing style, do not impose your own. Remove unused imports/variables/constants/POM methods. (🟡)

F. Network and mocks

  • Mocks (page.route) — only for edge cases (5xx, empty response, timeout, offline). The positive happy path — against the real API. (🟠)
  • Contract verification where it is the point of the test: waitForResponse (status + body) / waitForRequest + postDataJSON(). For forms — inspect the payload for [object Object], empty/non-serialized fields, not just "button is enabled". (🟠)
  • Routes are set up before the triggering action; scope — test/fixture, not globally on the suite. (🟠)
  • An external host that may not respond (e.g. an external account portal, a payment gateway): do not verify the transition "in depth" — the oracle is the initiated navigation request, not the target loading. Kill the request appropriately: route.abort() is fine only when the test ends there; if the test keeps living on the page (a repeat goto, further steps) — aborting a navigation sends Chromium to chrome-error:// and breaks the next navigation, and 204 is still treated by Chromium as a committed navigation. The working option is route.fulfill with an html stub (200 text/html) + a repeat goto. (🟠)
  • Your own routes are removed surgically — page.unroute(matcher, handler). unrouteAll() also wipes routes installed by project fixtures (stubs for hanging third-party hosts etc.) — after it, other tests/steps go flaky. (🟠)

G. Structure, readability, hygiene

  • Logical steps are wrapped in test.step('Imperative name', …) (visible in Allure/HTML/trace). return — outside the callback. Do not split into a step per action. (🟡)
  • No inline comments in tests — self-documentation (meaningful names, semantic locators, steps). Context — in the reporter description/annotation (e.g. allure.description), if the project uses them. (🟡)
  • Parameterize same-shaped cases via for...of outside test.describe, not test copies. (🟡)
  • No test.only, commented-out tests, temporary files/drafts, debug console.log/page.pause(). (🔴 for test.only/page.pause, otherwise 🟡)
  • Test/step names are meaningful; ID/tag format (@allure.id:N, TC key etc.) — as in the neighboring tests in the file. (⚪)

H. Bug masking and flake

  • No synthetic bypasses of the real UX: { force: true }, dispatchEvent, direct React/Vue setter, manual scroll instead of auto-actionability — unless justified by a controlled input (e.g. custom display:none inputs — verify in the browser). The fix must catch a regression if the feature breaks, not hide it. (🔴)
  • retries/mode: serial/an increased timeout are not used as a "cure" for flake. Quarantine is acceptable only temporarily, with a ticket link. (🟠)
  • try/catch does not swallow action/assert failures (auto-waiting is built in; .catch() hides the bug). (🟠)
  • A pre-release test (written before the feature ships) fails honestly, not hidden behind skip/a flag. (🟠)
  • A failing test was diagnosed before it was fixed: product bug or intended change? Evidence, not a guess — when it broke (run history; a group of tests going red on the same date is a release, not content drift), the same element compared across environments (present on staging, gone on production → production regression; absent on both → shipped deliberately), and internal asymmetry (visible on mobile but not on desktop, present in the DOM but hidden by CSS, only one A/B branch). Verdict "bug" → report it and mark that assertion test.fail with a ticket, do not retrofit the assertion to the current DOM. (🔴)
  • The fix does not weaken the oracle to go green: toBeVisible() → toBeAttached() (a CSS-hidden element then passes), a targeted assert swapped for a lenient counter, a check deleted citing "covered elsewhere" without reading that spec. Silencing the signal is not a fix. (🔴)

I. Special cases by test type

  • API: verify status AND body; request identifiers — a fresh randomUUID() from the built-in crypto per request (do not pull in the uuid package if the project does not have it); rate limit accounted for; cleanup of created entities. (🟠)
  • iframe: frameLocator; content is located inside the frame. New tab: context.waitForEvent('page'). Download: waitForEvent('download') + filename check. Upload: setInputFiles. Time: page.clock. Geolocation/permissions: grantPermissions/setGeolocation. (🟠 for manual workarounds)
  • visual: toHaveScreenshot with animations:'disabled' and mask on dynamic content; baselines — on the CI platform (a macOS baseline against Linux CI = guaranteed diff). Only if the test case requires a baseline. (🟠)

J. Intent conformance (the oracle actually verifies what is claimed)

  • The test verifies what the name/description promises, not a surrogate. "Form validation" → inspect the real payload, not just "button is enabled". "Load more" → actual loading of more items and verification, not just the click. (🟠)
  • Content binding is structural (presence, non-emptiness, count > 0, regex), so the test survives copy/price changes — especially for regression tests after a fix. (🟠)
  • Thresholds are proportionate to the observed facts. A counter with a multiple-fold margin (>= 8 where the page renders 15, >= 20 links where the footer has 40) survives losing half the page — a placebo oracle. Where a targeted anchor exists (a block's own class, links into a child section, footer columns), assert on it instead of a page-wide count; set thresholds from measured values on every environment. For each threshold, name the defect it still catches — and the one it no longer catches. (🟠)
  • The oracle matches the environment's limitation: where the UI does not distinguish 404/5xx (one stub for both) — the check is network-level, not "saw the error text". (🟠)
  • An oracle derived from the first item of a collection is verified against all of them. Block #1's layout/structure need not match block #3 (the first mosaic is a column, the third is "1 + 2"; the first card has a CTA button, its neighbor does not). Generalizing from first() yields either a false failure on correct markup or a test that depends on content order; assert the invariant shared by all items, not a property of the first one. (🟠)

K. Your project's rules (template — fill in for your repository)

A mature test repository always has conventions no universal checklist will catch. Record them here or in the project's CLAUDE.md — then the review will catch their violations. Typical categories with examples:

  • Custom fixtures: where to import test from the custom fixture (./fixtures/custom-test) instead of @playwright/test, and which mandatory checks it provides (e.g. a network error monitor invoked at the end of the test / in afterEach). (🟠)
  • Directory patterns: how the rules of the smoke / regress / api suites differ — composition vs fixtures for POM, reporter annotations, testMatch/testIgnore, where to add new tests. (🟠)
  • Environments: the test and POM are verified on all target environments, not just one (the DOM on the test environment may differ from prod); known environment quirks are recorded as a list. (🟠)
  • Skipped hygiene: the test does not add permanent skips to standard runs; environment-specific exclusion goes through config (testIgnore/testMatch), runtime test.skip — only for dynamic conditions (feature flag, known bug with a ticket). Run outcome: passed = ok, failed = problem, skipped = requires an explanation. (🟡)
  • Dependencies/config: do not bump the @playwright/test version and do not add dependencies without checking against CI (Docker image, lock file); do not touch playwright.config.ts without necessity. (🔴 if touched without being asked)

Report format

## Review: <files / scope>

**Static analysis:** typecheck ✅/❌ · lint ✅/❌ · (run: N/N pass, --repeat-each=5)

### 🔴 Blocker (N)
1. `path/to/spec.ts:42` — <what is wrong>.
   Why: <link to rule/category>.
   Fix:
   ```ts
   // ❌ before / ✅ after

🟠 Major (N)

…

🟡 Minor (N)

…

⚪ Nit (N)

…

✅ What is good

  • <what matches best practice — brief>

Verdict

<Ready to commit / Needs rework: list of Blocker+Major> · <run command with the correct --project>


Rules:
- Sort strictly by severity (Blocker → Nit). Within a level — by file/line.
- Every Blocker/Major — with a concrete fix (a `❌ before → ✅ after` snippet).
- A category is clean — write "clean", do not invent.
- At the end — a one-line verdict and the run command with the correct `--project`.
- If asked to apply fixes — do it **iteratively** (one change → typecheck/run → the next), do not rewrite a working test wholesale.

What ships with it: 1 file

21.6 KB alongside SKILL.md

references/

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most docs writing skills give

Counted across 1,951 of the 3,904 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Use third-person for skill descriptionsin 54 of 1951, across 35 files
  • Start descriptions with Use whenin 43 of 1951, across 29 files
  • Run baseline scenarios before writing any skillin 40 of 1951, across 26 files
  • Use active voicein 40 of 1951, across 36 files
  • Map file responsibilities before defining tasksin 36 of 1951, across 29 files
  • Use checkbox syntax for tracking stepsin 35 of 1951, across 27 files
  • Ask one question at a timein 35 of 1951
  • Offer execution options after saving the planin 33 of 1951, across 24 files
  • Include complete code in every stepin 33 of 1951, across 27 files
  • Design units with clear boundaries and interfacesin 31 of 1951, across 23 files
  • Announce the skill usage at the startin 30 of 1951
  • Verify agent compliance after adding the skillin 29 of 1951, across 17 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Run static analysis before reporting findings
  • Review only new or changed code
  • Verify every finding against actual file lines
  • Run typecheck on new code
  • Check lint rules enabled in project configuration
  • Use web-first assertions for all tests

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 626,045. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.