Report quality review
Skill aizech/clinical-skills/.continue/skills/report-quality-review
Monitors and improves radiology report quality through systematic audit and feedback. Use when user mentions "report quality review", "discrepancy audit", "report completeness", "addendum analysis", or needs quality assurance.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add aizech/clinical-skills --skill report-quality-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, 396 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Report Quality Review Skill
Triggers
- "report quality review"
- "discrepancy audit"
- "report completeness"
- "addendum analysis"
- "quality improvement"
- "peer review"
- "report turnaround"
Parameters
review_type(required): Type of quality reviewcompleteness- Required element adherencediscrepancy- Error and miss analysisturnaround- TAT compliance monitoringcommunication- Critical result documentationattribution- Report signature verificationcqi- Continuous quality improvement tracking
modality(optional): Filter by imaging typetime_range(optional): Review period - defaults to last 30 daysurgency(optional): Filter by clinical setting (ED, inpatient, outpatient)
Quality Metrics Tracked
- Completeness: Required elements, comparison documentation, impression presence
- Accuracy: Discrepancy rates, addendum rates, amended findings
- Timeliness: TAT by setting, protocol compliance, pending report alerts
- Communication: Critical result documentation, escalation compliance
- Format: Structured data presence,标准化 terminology use
Output Format
Returns structured JSON with:
- Quality score by metric category
- Trend analysis (improving/declining)
- Individual radiologist feedback (anonymized aggregates)
- Improvement recommendations
- Peer review learning points
Usage Examples
review_type: completeness
modality: CT
time_range: last_month
review_type: discrepancy
time_range: last_quarter
urgency: ED
Integration Points
- RIS for report content and timestamps
- PACS for comparison study tracking
- Communication logs for critical result verification
- Peer review system for discrepancy classification
What ships with it: 1 file
3.2 KB alongside SKILL.md
evals/
- evals.json3.2 KB