Image quality audit
Skill aizech/clinical-skills/.bob/skills/image-quality-audit
A collection of AI agent skills focused on medical imaging and healthcare workflows. Built for radiologists, healthcare IT professionals, and researchers who want AI coding agents to help with imaging workflows, clinical documentation, AI integration, and medical research. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, and many other agents.
npx -y skills add aizech/clinical-skills --skill image-quality-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Assesses medical image quality against clinical standards and identifies optimization opportunities. Use when user mentions "image quality audit", "artifact review", "dose analysis", "protocol deviation", "quality metrics", "diagnostic adequacy", or "technique optimization".
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Image Quality Audit Skill
Triggers
- "image quality audit"
- "artifact review"
- "dose analysis"
- "protocol deviation"
- "quality metrics"
- "diagnostic adequacy"
- "technique optimization"
Parameters
audit_type(required): Type of quality assessmentartifact- Motion, noise, streak artifactsdose- Radiation dose optimization and DRL complianceprotocol- Protocol adherence and deviation analysisadequacy- Diagnostic sufficiency for intended purposetechnique- Technical parameters reviewcomprehensive- Full quality review
modality(required): Imaging modality to audittime_range(optional): Audit period - defaults to last 7 dayssample_size(optional): Studies to review - defaults to all in rangeseverity_threshold(optional): Minimum severity to flag
Evaluation Criteria
- Artifacts: Type, severity (1-5), impact on diagnostic utility
- Dose: DLP, CTDIvol vs. ACR reference levels, size-adjusted metrics
- Protocol: Coverage completeness, sequence selection, contrast timing
- Adequacy: Signal-to-noise, spatial resolution, positioning
Output Format
Returns structured JSON with:
- Quality metrics summary
- Severity distribution
- Contributing factors analysis
- Improvement recommendations ranked by impact
- Training priorities for technologist/site issues
Usage Examples
audit_type: artifact
modality: CT
time_range: last_week
severity_threshold: 3
audit_type: dose
modality: CT
time_range: last_month
Standards Reference
- ACR Physical Parameters for CT, MRI, Ultrasound, Mammography
- ICRP and ACR dose reference levels
- modality-specific practice guidelines