agentsclimarketplace

Performance gate

Skill aiskillstore/marketplace/skills/danielpodolsky/performance-gate

Security-audited skills for Claude, Codex & Claude Code. One-click install, quality verified.

Install
npx -y skills add aiskillstore/marketplace --skill performance-gate

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Verify performance implications were considered and no obvious anti-patterns exist. Issues result in WARNINGS.

SKILL.md

5.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Gate 4: Performance Review

"Code that works is step one. Code that scales is step two."

Purpose

This gate catches performance anti-patterns before they cause problems. The focus is on obvious issues, not micro-optimizations.

Gate Status

  • PASS — No obvious performance issues
  • WARNING — Issues found that could cause problems at scale

Gate Questions

Question 1: Scalability

"What happens when there are 10,000 items? 1,000,000?"

Looking for:

  • Awareness of data growth
  • Pagination for large datasets
  • Efficient data structures
  • No unnecessary loops

Question 2: Query Efficiency

"How many database queries does this operation make?"

Looking for:

  • No N+1 queries
  • Bulk operations where appropriate
  • Indexes on queried columns
  • Awareness of query cost

Question 3: Re-render Awareness (Frontend)

"When this state changes, what components re-render?"

Looking for:

  • Awareness of render triggers
  • Appropriate memoization
  • State placement optimization
  • No expensive computations in render

Performance Checklist

Database Operations

  • No N+1 queries (queries inside loops)
  • Pagination for list endpoints
  • Indexes on frequently queried columns
  • SELECT only needed columns (not SELECT *)

Frontend Rendering

  • Expensive computations use useMemo
  • Event handlers use useCallback where needed
  • Large lists use virtualization
  • Heavy components are lazy loaded

API & Network

  • Response payloads are minimal
  • Large data is paginated
  • Caching headers where appropriate
  • No redundant API calls

General

  • No nested loops (O(n²)) without justification
  • No blocking operations
  • Cleanup of intervals/timeouts
  • Reasonable memory usage

Response Templates

If PASS

✅ PERFORMANCE GATE: PASSED

Performance considerations look good:
- Data fetching is efficient
- No obvious N+1 patterns
- Appropriate pagination in place

Moving to the next gate...

If WARNING

⚠️ PERFORMANCE GATE: WARNING

Found [X] performance concerns:

**Issue 1: [N+1 Query / Inefficient Loop]**
Location: `file.ts:42`
Question: "This makes [N] queries. Can we batch into 1?"

**Issue 2: [Missing Pagination]**
Location: `file.ts:88`
Question: "What happens with 100,000 records?"

**Issue 3: [Expensive Render]**
Location: `Component.tsx:15`
Question: "Does this need to recalculate on every render?"

These may not matter now, but will become problems as the app grows.

Common Issues to Check

1. The N+1 Query Problem

❌ const users = await User.findAll();
   for (const user of users) {
     user.posts = await Post.findByUserId(user.id);
   }
   // 1 + N queries!

✅ const users = await User.findAll({
     include: [{ model: Post }]
   });
   // 1 query with JOIN

2. Fetching Everything

❌ // Returns 10,000 users with 50 fields each
   GET /api/users

✅ // Paginated with only needed fields
   GET /api/users?page=1&limit=20&fields=id,name,email

3. Expensive Render Calculations

❌ function UserList({ users }) {
     // Runs on every render
     const sorted = users.sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name));
     return <ul>{sorted.map(...)}</ul>;
   }

✅ function UserList({ users }) {
     const sorted = useMemo(
       () => [...users].sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)),
       [users]
     );
     return <ul>{sorted.map(...)}</ul>;
   }

4. Inline Functions Causing Re-renders

❌ function Parent() {
     return <Child onClick={() => doSomething()} />;
     // New function every render → Child re-renders
   }

✅ function Parent() {
     const handleClick = useCallback(() => doSomething(), []);
     return <Child onClick={handleClick} />;
   }

5. Missing Cleanup

❌ useEffect(() => {
     const interval = setInterval(fetchData, 5000);
     // Memory leak! Runs forever
   }, []);

✅ useEffect(() => {
     const interval = setInterval(fetchData, 5000);
     return () => clearInterval(interval);
   }, []);

Socratic Performance Questions

Instead of pointing out the fix, ask:

  1. "How many queries does this endpoint execute for 100 users?"
  2. "If I add 10,000 more items, what breaks?"
  3. "Does this array get re-sorted on every render?"
  4. "What clears this interval when the component unmounts?"
  5. "Do we need all 50 columns from this table?"

Big O Quick Reference

PatternComplexity10,000 itemsConcern Level
Map lookupO(1)1 opFine
Single loopO(n)10,000 opsUsually fine
Nested loopO(n²)100M opsWarning
Triple loopO(n³)1T opsCritical

Performance Red Flags

FlagQuestionWhy
Query in a loop"Can we batch?"N+1 problem
No pagination"What at scale?"Memory/time explosion
SELECT *"Need all fields?"Wasted bandwidth
setInterval no cleanup"What clears this?"Memory leak
Inline object/function in JSX"New reference?"Unnecessary re-renders
Array.sort() in render"Cached?"Runs every render

When to NOT Worry

Not everything needs optimization:

  • Small datasets: Don't paginate 20 items
  • Rare operations: One-time admin scripts can be slow
  • Prototype phase: Get it working first
  • Micro-optimizations: Focus on algorithms, not for vs forEach

The gate is about catching obvious issues, not micro-optimization.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.