Writing plans
Skill aiskillstore/marketplace/skills/codingcossack/writing-plans
Security-audited skills for Claude, Codex & Claude Code. One-click install, quality verified.
npx -y skills add aiskillstore/marketplace --skill writing-plansAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Structured implementation planning for multi-step development tasks. Use when you have a spec or requirements and need to break work into executable steps.
SKILL.md
3.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Writing Plans
Overview
Create implementation plans for an engineer with zero codebase context.
Each plan includes:
- Exact file paths for every operation
- Complete code (not "add validation here")
- Test-first approach with verification commands
- Bite-sized steps (2-5 min each)
Principles: DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: Run in dedicated worktree. If none exists, use using-git-worktrees skill first.
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
Before Writing
- Read spec/requirements completely
- Explore project structure (
view .) - Identify tech stack (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.)
- Note existing patterns in similar files
- Check docs/ for existing conventions
Bite-Sized Task Granularity
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes), independently verifiable:
- "Write the failing test" — step
- "Run it to confirm failure" — step
- "Implement minimal code to pass" — step
- "Run tests to confirm pass" — step
- "Commit" — step
Plan Document Header
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
Task Structure
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
```
**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
```python
def function(input):
return expected
```
**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS
**Step 5: Commit**
```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```
Before Handoff
Verify plan completeness:
- Every file path exists or will be created
- Every command can be run exactly as written
- No TODO/placeholder text remains
- Tests cover all acceptance criteria from spec
- Include exact test code, not descriptions
Execution Handoff
After saving plan, present:
"Plan saved to docs/plans/<filename>.md. Choose execution mode:
- Subagent-Driven — same session, fresh subagent per task, fast iteration
- Parallel Session — new session, batched execution with checkpoints
Which approach?"
If Subagent-Driven chosen
- Stay in this session
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:
subagent-driven-development - Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review
If Parallel Session chosen
- Guide user to open new session in worktree
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: New session uses
executing-plans