agentsclimarketplace

Tdd

Skill aiskillstore/marketplace/skills/benny9193/tdd

Security-audited skills for Claude, Codex & Claude Code. One-click install, quality verified.

Install
npx -y skills add aiskillstore/marketplace --skill tdd

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Test-Driven Development workflow - write tests first, then implementation

SKILL.md

5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

Follow the Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly. Never write production code without a failing test first.

The TDD Cycle

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                         │
│    ┌───────┐                           │
│    │  RED  │ Write a failing test      │
│    └───┬───┘                           │
│        │                               │
│        ▼                               │
│    ┌───────┐                           │
│    │ GREEN │ Write minimal code to pass│
│    └───┬───┘                           │
│        │                               │
│        ▼                               │
│    ┌──────────┐                        │
│    │ REFACTOR │ Improve without        │
│    └────┬─────┘ breaking tests         │
│         │                              │
│         └──────────────────────────────┘

Rules (Non-Negotiable)

  1. No production code without a failing test

    • Write the test first
    • Watch it fail
    • Only then write implementation
  2. Write the minimum test to fail

    • One assertion per test
    • Test behavior, not implementation
    • Start with the simplest case
  3. Write the minimum code to pass

    • Don't anticipate future needs
    • Hardcode if that makes it pass
    • Generalize only when forced by tests
  4. Refactor only when green

    • All tests must pass before refactoring
    • Keep tests passing during refactoring
    • Small steps only

Workflow

Phase 1: RED (Write Failing Test)

// Start with what you want the API to look like
describe('Calculator', () => {
  it('should add two numbers', () => {
    const calc = new Calculator();
    expect(calc.add(2, 3)).toBe(5);
  });
});

Run test → Watch it fail → Confirm it fails for the RIGHT reason

Phase 2: GREEN (Make It Pass)

// Write the SIMPLEST code that passes
class Calculator {
  add(a: number, b: number): number {
    return 5; // Yes, hardcoding is fine here!
  }
}

Run test → Watch it pass → Celebrate (briefly)

Phase 3: Add Another Test (Force Generalization)

it('should add different numbers', () => {
  const calc = new Calculator();
  expect(calc.add(1, 1)).toBe(2); // Forces real implementation
});

Phase 4: GREEN Again

class Calculator {
  add(a: number, b: number): number {
    return a + b; // Now we generalize
  }
}

Phase 5: REFACTOR

With green tests, improve the code:

  • Remove duplication
  • Improve names
  • Extract methods
  • Keep tests green throughout

Test Naming Convention

Use this pattern: should [expected behavior] when [condition]

it('should return empty array when input is null')
it('should throw ValidationError when email is invalid')
it('should retry 3 times when connection fails')

TDD Checklist

Before writing ANY code, verify:

  • I have a failing test
  • The test fails for the expected reason
  • The test is testing behavior, not implementation
  • The test name describes what it verifies

Before marking GREEN:

  • Test passes
  • I wrote the minimum code necessary
  • I didn't add "extra" functionality

Before REFACTORING:

  • All tests are green
  • I have a specific improvement in mind
  • Changes are small and incremental

Common TDD Mistakes

❌ Writing Tests After Code

This is not TDD. Tests written after tend to test implementation, not behavior.

❌ Writing Too Many Tests at Once

Write ONE test, make it pass, then write the next. Stay in the cycle.

❌ Making Big Jumps

If your implementation is more than a few lines, you skipped steps. Add intermediate tests.

❌ Testing Implementation Details

// BAD - tests implementation
expect(user._hashedPassword).toMatch(/^[a-f0-9]{64}$/);

// GOOD - tests behavior
expect(user.verifyPassword('correct')).toBe(true);

❌ Refactoring While Red

Never refactor with failing tests. Get green first.

Starting a New Feature with TDD

  1. List behaviors the feature needs (user stories → test cases)
  2. Order from simplest to most complex
  3. Write first test for simplest behavior
  4. Cycle through Red-Green-Refactor
  5. Add tests for edge cases
  6. Add tests for error handling

Example Session

Goal: Implement a slugify function

// Test 1: Simplest case
it('should lowercase the input', () => {
  expect(slugify('Hello')).toBe('hello');
});
// Implementation: return input.toLowerCase();

// Test 2: Handle spaces
it('should replace spaces with hyphens', () => {
  expect(slugify('Hello World')).toBe('hello-world');
});
// Implementation: return input.toLowerCase().replace(/ /g, '-');

// Test 3: Handle special characters
it('should remove special characters', () => {
  expect(slugify('Hello, World!')).toBe('hello-world');
});
// Implementation: add .replace(/[^a-z0-9-]/g, '');

// Test 4: Edge case
it('should handle empty string', () => {
  expect(slugify('')).toBe('');
});
// Already passes! No change needed.

Remember

"TDD is not about testing. It's about design."

The tests drive you toward better, more modular code. Trust the process.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.