Arch mvp roadmap
Skill ai-enhanced-engineer/aiee-skills/skills/arch-mvp-roadmap
MVP definition, MoSCoW prioritization, and phased delivery planning. Use for scoping minimum viable products, ordering features by value and dependency, or creating implementation roadmaps.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ai-enhanced-engineer/aiee-skills --skill arch-mvp-roadmapAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
MVP & Roadmap Planning
Patterns for defining what to build first and in what order.
Core Principle
"Build the smallest thing that proves value."
An MVP is not a half-built product—it's a complete vertical slice that validates assumptions.
MoSCoW Prioritization
| Priority | Definition | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Must Have | System doesn't function without | Core journey incomplete, no workarounds |
| Should Have | Important but not blocking | Workarounds exist, high value |
| Visible as Placeholder | UI ships visible but non-functional at launch; wired up in a later phase | Surface needed for UX coherence/nav completeness; functionality deferred |
| Could Have | Nice to have | Enhances experience, low priority |
| Won't Have | Explicitly out of scope | Prevents scope creep, document for later |
Visible-as-Placeholder Tier — When To Use
Standard MoSCoW leaves a gap: features that need to be visible at launch but not functional yet. Naming this tier explicitly makes the app feel coherent without over-promising.
Use Visible-as-Placeholder (not Could-have) when:
- Removing the surface would leave a hole in nav, settings, or a flow users will notice
- A linked feature elsewhere references this surface (deep links, empty-state CTAs, dashboard tiles)
- The functional version is planned for a known later phase
Use Could-have instead when the feature's absence is invisible or there is no committed plan to ship it.
See reference.md § Visible-as-Placeholder for a worked marketplace example with five surfaces.
MVP Scoping Checklist
- Single complete user journey end-to-end
- Validates core assumption/hypothesis
- Deployable and demonstrable
- Measurable success criteria defined
- No features without corresponding tests
Phased Delivery Pattern
Each phase should:
- Build on previous phase (not parallel development)
- Be independently deployable
- Have clear success criteria
- Include tests for new functionality
Dependency Ordering
Order features by:
| Factor | Question |
|---|---|
| Technical | What must exist first? |
| Value | What provides most value soonest? |
| Risk | What validates riskiest assumptions? |
| Learning | What teaches us most about the domain? |
Roadmap Template
| Phase | Features | Success Criteria | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVP | [Must-haves] | [Measurable outcomes] | None |
| Phase 2 | [Should-haves] | [Measurable outcomes] | MVP complete |
| Phase 3 | [Could-haves] | [Measurable outcomes] | Phase 2 complete |
Extensible Algorithm Design
Design algorithms for evolution using stable interfaces. MVP delivers value immediately while building ground truth for future ML phases. Evolution path: Deterministic (MVP) → Statistical (Phase 2) → ML/embeddings (Phase 3) → LLM-powered (Phase 4). Switch implementations via dependency injection against a stable Protocol interface; MVP uses zero ML infrastructure.
See reference.md § Extensible Algorithm Design for the interface pattern, key principles, and workstream-split sizing. See examples.md for sample roadmaps.