Web design system
Skill ahtishamshahzad/agent_dev_flow/.ai/skills/web/web-design-system
Use to plan the web design system — tokens (color/spacing/typography/radius), scales, reusable primitives, the styling approach (Tailwind, CSS Modules, CSS-in-JS), and component-library evaluation. Also decides how UI is shared across web apps and the dashboard.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ahtishamshahzad/agent_dev_flow --skill web-design-systemAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.9 KB, 956 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Web Design System
Purpose
Define the visual and component foundation for the web app(s): design tokens, scales, reusable primitives, a justified styling approach, and whether/how the system is shared across multiple web apps (marketing site, customer app, dashboard).
When to Use
- After the foundation skill, before building screens at scale.
- When UI inconsistency or ad-hoc styling is accumulating in an existing app.
- Not for theming mechanics (
web-theme) or one-off page styling.
Inputs
- Brand/design direction (if any) and the page inventory.
- Selected applications and dashboard placement (
dashboard-architecture) — they determine sharing needs. - Framework foundation (styling integrates differently in Next.js server components vs a Vite SPA).
Discovery Questions
- Is there an existing brand/design language to encode, or are we establishing one?
- Which styling approach fits the team: Tailwind, CSS Modules, CSS-in-JS (note server-component constraints)?
- Should a headless/component library (e.g., Radix primitives, shadcn/ui-style copies) be evaluated, or is the surface small?
- Do multiple apps (customer app + dashboard) need to share this system — and via what boundary (shared package, copy, monorepo)?
Responsibilities
- Define tokens: color (semantic, theme-ready for
web-theme), spacing, typography, radius, elevation, breakpoints — as the single styling vocabulary. - Define scales and layout primitives (stack/grid/container) before one-off components.
- Evaluate the styling approach and any component library as decisions with trade-offs — not defaults.
- Specify the core primitives (Button, Input, Card, Dialog, Table shell…) with accessibility expectations built in (
web-accessibility). - Decide UI sharing across apps: shared package vs duplication, aligned with
dashboard-architectureand../../repository-architecture.
Required Workflow
- Gather brand direction and sharing requirements.
- Define tokens and scales; make color tokens semantic (theme-ready).
- Choose the styling approach + library candidates with justification.
- List the primitive set needed by the actual page inventory.
- Record the plan; install nothing without approval.
Decision Rules
- Tokens first: no primitive ships with hardcoded values that a token should own.
- Prefer headless/accessible primitives over restyling heavy widget suites.
- CSS-in-JS runtimes conflict with server components — verify compatibility before recommending on Next.js.
- Share UI across apps only when
dashboard-architecturekeeps them in one system; a separate-repo dashboard may deliberately diverge.
Rules
- Accessibility (roles, focus, contrast) is part of a primitive's definition of done.
- No new one-off variant when a token/primitive extension covers it.
- Long code examples live in
../../../references/web/design-system/, not in this skill.
Anti-Patterns
- Building screens first and extracting a "design system" from the wreckage later.
- Adopting a large component library for three primitives.
- Hardcoding hex values/pixel sizes that bypass tokens.
- Duplicating a diverging copy of the system per app without a decision.
Validation Checklist
- Tokens and scales defined; colors semantic and theme-ready.
- Styling approach chosen with justification (server-component compatible if Next.js).
- Component-library decision recorded (adopt/partial/none) with trade-offs.
- Primitive set specified with accessibility expectations.
- Cross-app sharing decision aligned with dashboard placement.
Definition of Done
A recorded design-system plan — tokens, scales, styling approach, primitive set, and sharing boundary — that screens can be built against consistently, with no unapproved installs.
Related Skills
web-theme, web-accessibility, dashboard-architecture, ../../repository-architecture, nextjs-foundation, vite-react-foundation, dashboard-tables.
Related Knowledge
../../../knowledge/ (brand direction, UI conventions).
Related References
../../../references/web/design-system/ (token tables, primitive specs — when populated).
Context Loading Guidance
- Requires: brand direction, page inventory, sharing needs, framework foundation.
- Does not require: full app source, data/state detail.
- May load:
web-themewhen tokens are ready;dashboard-architecturefor sharing boundaries. - Stop when: tokens, approach, and primitive set are recorded.
Token Efficiency Guidance
Keep token definitions tabular and terse. Specify primitives as one-line contracts; push code samples to references.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.