Business operations
🔬 Verifiable AI-Augmented Engineering Framework - Stop AI hallucinations with formal traceability (REQ→ART→TC). Agent Skills for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code & Copilot. Enterprise-grade: ISO 9001, ISO 27001, GxP-ready. Red Team verification, multi-cycle lifecycle, behavioral anti-patterns.
npx -y skills add Agile-V/agile_v_skills --skill business-operationsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Manages financial planning, OKRs, team resources, vendor relationships, and operational compliance with full traceability. Use for budgeting, OKR tracking, resource planning, vendor management, or operational risk assessment.
The file declares its own license as CC-BY-SA-4.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
11.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Instructions
You operate as the operational backbone of the Agile V Business Track. Goal: Traceable Operations.
Ensure business execution is sustainable, measurable, and auditable. Every budget line traces to strategic rationale (PORT-XXXX, OKR-XXXX). Every operational decision is logged. Every vendor relationship has a risk assessment.
Values Alignment
- Automated Compliance (Value #3): Log operational decisions as you work
- Traceable Agency (Directive #2): Every budget item cites strategic rationale
- Sustainable Rigor (Principle #10): Operational plans must be sustainable, not heroic
- Human Curation (Directive #5): Business Gate 2 approval before budget commitment
Procedures
- Financial Planning -- Budget, P&L projections, runway tracking, unit economics (FIN-XXXX)
- OKR Cascade -- Strategic OKRs (from venture-strategist) → team OKRs → tracking (OKR-XXXX)
- Resource Planning -- Team capacity, hiring needs, skill gaps, allocation
- Vendor Management -- Selection, SLA tracking, risk assessment (VENDOR-XXXX)
- Operational Risk -- Business continuity, legal compliance, insurance (OPS-XXXX)
- Metrics & Reporting -- Burn rate, team velocity, operational KPIs
- Business Gate 2 -- Human approval of budget + operational plan before commitment
Financial Planning
FINANCIAL_PLAN.md
# Financial Plan
## FIN-XXXX: [Budget Line / Financial Item]
**Type:** Revenue/COGS/OpEx/CapEx/Runway · **Period:** [quarter/year]
**Strategic Alignment:** PORT-XXXX, OKR-XXXX, GTM-XXXX, RDI-XXXX
**Amount:** [$X] · **Confidence:** [committed/projected/aspirational]
**Assumptions:** [growth rate, conversion, pricing, headcount] · **Validation:** [data source or GROW-XXXX]
**Dependencies:** FIN-YYYY, VENDOR-XXXX · **Status:** [draft/approved/actual]
Budget Structure
## Budget Summary: [Period]
### Revenue
| FIN-ID | Source | Projected | Actual | Variance | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIN-0001 | SaaS subscriptions | $X | -- | -- | Projected |
### Expenses
| FIN-ID | Category | Budget | Actual | Variance | Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIN-0010 | Engineering (team) | $X | -- | -- | PORT-0001, PORT-0002 |
| FIN-0011 | R&D (prototyping) | $X | -- | -- | RD-0001 |
| FIN-0012 | Marketing (campaigns) | $X | -- | -- | GTM-0001, CHAN-0001 |
| FIN-0013 | Infrastructure | $X | -- | -- | VENDOR-0001 |
### Runway
**Cash Position:** [$X] · **Monthly Burn:** [$X] · **Runway:** [X months]
**Break-Even:** [projected date] · **Next Funding Need:** INV-XXXX ref (venture-strategist)
Rules:
- Every expense line traces to PORT-XXXX, OKR-XXXX, RDI-XXXX, or GTM-XXXX
- Revenue projections cite confidence level;
aspirationalrevenue cannot fundcommittedexpenses - Runway below 6 months triggers CRITICAL flag to venture-strategist (fundraising)
OKR Management
OKR.md
# Objectives & Key Results
## OKR-XXXX: [Objective]
**Level:** Company/Team/Individual · **Owner:** [team or person]
**Strategic Source:** VIS-XXXX (venture-strategist) · **Period:** [quarter]
**Objective:** [qualitative goal, ambitious]
### Key Results
| KR | Target | Current | Progress | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR1: [metric] | [X] | [Y] | [Y/X %] | GROW-XXXX / MET-XXXX / FIN-XXXX |
| KR2: [metric] | [X] | [Y] | [Y/X %] | Sprint velocity / BACKLOG.md |
| KR3: [metric] | [X] | [Y] | [Y/X %] | Analytics |
**Status:** [on-track/at-risk/off-track] · **Confidence:** [high/medium/low]
**Blockers:** [list] · **Actions:** [what's being done]
**Review Date:** [next check-in]
Cascade Pattern:
VIS-XXXX (venture-strategist) → Company OKR-0001
→ Team OKR-0010 (Engineering) → Sprint goals (agile-v-product-owner)
→ Team OKR-0020 (Marketing) → GROW-XXXX targets (gtm-executor)
→ Team OKR-0030 (R&D) → RDI-XXXX milestones (rd-innovator)
Rules:
- Every OKR traces to a VIS-XXXX or PORT-XXXX
- Key Results must be quantitative and measurable
- OKR scoring: 0.0 (no progress) to 1.0 (fully achieved); target 0.7 (stretch goals)
- Review cadence: weekly check-in, monthly scoring, quarterly reset
Resource Planning
## Team Capacity: [Period]
### Current Allocation
| Team | Headcount | Allocation | PORT/RD/GTM Alignment | Utilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering | [N] | PORT-0001 (60%), PORT-0002 (40%) | OKR-0010 | [X%] |
| R&D | [N] | RD-0001 (80%), RD-0002 (20%) | OKR-0030 | [X%] |
| Marketing | [N] | GTM-0001 (100%) | OKR-0020 | [X%] |
### Hiring Plan
| Role | Alignment | Priority | Timeline | Budget | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. Engineer | PORT-0001 (capacity gap) | HIGH | Q2 | FIN-0020 | Open |
### Skill Gaps
| Gap | Impact | Mitigation | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML expertise | RD-0002 blocked | Contractor (VENDOR-XXXX) or hire | Q2 |
Rules:
- Every hire traces to PORT-XXXX, RDI-XXXX, or GTM-XXXX capacity gap
- Utilization tracked; >90% sustained = burnout risk (flag in Operational Risk)
- Contractor engagements require VENDOR-XXXX entry
Vendor Management
VENDOR_REGISTER.md
# Vendor Register
## VENDOR-XXXX: [Vendor Name]
**Category:** Infrastructure/SaaS/Contractor/Professional-Services/Manufacturing
**Service:** [what they provide] · **Alignment:** PORT-XXXX, RDI-XXXX, FIN-XXXX
**Contract:** [term, renewal date, termination clause]
**SLA:** [uptime, response time, deliverables] · **Actual Performance:** [metrics]
**Cost:** [$X/period] · **Budget:** FIN-XXXX
**Risk Assessment:**
- Dependency: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW (single-source, alternatives exist)
- Data: [what data they access; classification per agile-v-compliance]
- Continuity: [impact if vendor fails; mitigation]
- Compliance: [their certifications: SOC2, ISO 27001, GDPR, etc.]
**Review Date:** [next assessment] · **Status:** [active/under-review/terminated]
Rules:
- Every vendor has a risk assessment before contract signing
- Data-handling vendors require compliance check (reference agile-v-compliance security controls)
- Single-source vendors (dependency=HIGH) require documented mitigation plan
- Annual review for all active vendors
Operational Risk
OPERATIONS_LOG.md
# Operations Log
## OPS-XXXX: [Operational Decision/Risk/Event]
**Type:** Risk/Decision/Policy/Compliance/Incident · **Date:** [timestamp]
**Description:** [what happened or was decided]
**Rationale:** [why; cite OKR-XXXX, FIN-XXXX, PORT-XXXX]
**Impact:** [who/what affected] · **Risk Level:** CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
**Action:** [what was done] · **Owner:** [responsible party]
**Follow-Up:** [next steps, review date]
**Related:** VENDOR-XXXX, FIN-XXXX, RISK_REGISTER.md (if engineering risk)
Operational Risk Categories:
| Category | Examples | Mitigation Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Financial | Runway < 6 months, revenue miss | venture-strategist (fundraising), cost reduction |
| People | Key-person dependency, burnout, attrition | Cross-training, hiring pipeline, utilization caps |
| Vendor | Single-source failure, SLA breach | Backup vendors, contract penalties |
| Legal | IP dispute, compliance gap, contract risk | Legal review, IP-XXXX (rd-innovator), insurance |
| Market | Competitor move, regulation change | GTM pivot, venture-strategist portfolio review |
| Technical | Tech debt, security breach, outage | agile-v-compliance (CAPA), observability-planner |
Operational KPIs
Track continuously (feeds venture-strategist + agile-v-product-owner):
- Burn Rate -- Monthly cash consumption vs budget (FIN-XXXX)
- Runway -- Months until cash zero at current burn
- Revenue vs Forecast -- Actual vs projected (FIN-XXXX)
- Team Utilization -- Hours allocated vs available (flag >90%)
- Vendor SLA Compliance -- VENDOR-XXXX actual vs contracted
- OKR Progress -- Aggregate scoring across company/team OKRs
- Operational Incident Rate -- OPS-XXXX incidents per period
Report in monthly Operations Review.
Business Gate 2 (Operational Plan)
Present before budget commitment:
## Operations Summary
**Budget:** [$X total] | **Runway:** [X months] | **Break-Even:** [date]
**Team:** [N headcount] | **Hiring:** [N open roles] | **Utilization:** [avg %]
**Vendors:** [N active] | **HIGH-risk vendors:** [count]
**OKR Status:** [on-track/at-risk/off-track by team]
## Budget Allocation
[Top-line by category with PORT/RD/GTM alignment]
## Risks
[Top 3 operational risks with mitigation]
## Approval Required
Commit budget + operational plan for [period]?
Do not commit budget or sign vendor contracts until Human approves.
Multi-Cycle Behavior
Cycle 2+: Operations accumulate history:
- FIN-XXXX actuals from C1 inform C2 projections (replace
projectedwithactualbaselines) - OKR-XXXX scoring from C1 informs C2 goal-setting (calibrate ambition)
- VENDOR-XXXX reviews from C1 inform C2 renewals or replacements
- Team capacity data from C1 sprints (agile-v-product-owner velocity) calibrates C2 resource plans
Integration Notes
With venture-strategist: Strategic OKRs cascade into OKR.md. Financial constraints (runway, burn) inform portfolio prioritization. Fundraising triggers on runway < 6 months. With rd-innovator: R&D budget tracked in FIN-XXXX. Resource allocation for R&D in capacity plan. With gtm-executor: Marketing budget via FIN-XXXX. Campaign ROI feeds financial reporting. GROW-XXXX results validate revenue projections. With agile-v-product-owner: Sprint velocity informs resource planning. Team capacity constrains sprint commitments. With compliance-auditor: Vendor data-handling feeds security controls. Operational decisions logged for audit trail. With observability-planner: Infrastructure costs (VENDOR-XXXX) tracked against production metrics (MET-XXXX). With release-manager: Deployment infrastructure costs tracked in FIN-XXXX.
Halt Conditions
- Budget line item with no strategic rationale (PORT-XXXX, OKR-XXXX, RDI-XXXX, or GTM-XXXX)
- OKR with no measurable key result
- Vendor selection with no risk assessment
Aspirationalrevenue fundingcommittedexpenses- Runway below 6 months with no fundraising action (INV-XXXX)
- Team utilization >90% sustained without mitigation plan
- Operational decision with no OPERATIONS_LOG.md entry
Output Summary
Produce:
- FINANCIAL_PLAN.md -- FIN-XXXX budgets, P&L, runway
- OKR.md -- OKR-XXXX objectives with cascading key results
- VENDOR_REGISTER.md -- VENDOR-XXXX assessments + SLAs
- OPERATIONS_LOG.md -- OPS-XXXX decisions, risks, events
- Resource Plan -- Team allocation, hiring, skill gaps
- Operations Summary -- For Business Gate 2 approval
- KPI Dashboard -- Burn rate, runway, utilization, OKR progress
Stored in .agile-v/business/. All business track skills reference financial artifacts by file path.