Chai
Claude Code skills for protein design
npx -y skills add adaptyvbio/protein-design-skills --skill chaiAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Structure prediction using Chai-1, a foundation model for molecular structure. Use this skill when: (1) Predicting protein-protein complex structures, (2) Validating designed binders, (3) Predicting protein-ligand complexes, (4) Using the Chai API for high-throughput prediction, (5) Need an alternative to AlphaFold2. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For AlphaFold2 prediction, use alphafold. For ESM-based analysis, use esm.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Chai-1 Structure Prediction
Prerequisites
| Requirement | Minimum | Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Python | 3.10+ | 3.11 |
| CUDA | 12.0+ | 12.1+ |
| GPU VRAM | 24GB | 40GB (A100) |
| RAM | 32GB | 64GB |
How to run
First time? See Getting started to set up Modal and biomodals.
Option 1: Modal
cd biomodals
modal run modal_chai1.py \
--input-faa complex.fasta \
--out-dir predictions/
GPU: A100 (40GB) | Timeout: 30min default
Option 2: Chai API (recommended)
pip install chai_lab
python -c "
import chai_lab
from chai_lab.chai1 import run_inference
# Run prediction
run_inference(
fasta_file='complex.fasta',
output_dir='predictions/',
num_trunk_recycles=3
)
"
Option 3: Local installation
git clone https://github.com/chaidiscovery/chai-lab.git
cd chai-lab
pip install -e .
chai-lab predict \
--fasta complex.fasta \
--output predictions/
FASTA Format
Protein complex
>binder
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>target
MVLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGE...
Protein + ligand
>protein
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>ligand|smiles
CCO
Protein + DNA/RNA
>protein
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>dna
ATCGATCGATCG
Key parameters
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
num_trunk_recycles | 3 | 1-10 | Recycles (more = better) |
num_diffn_timesteps | 200 | 50-500 | Diffusion steps |
seed | 0 | int | Random seed |
Output format
predictions/
├── pred.model_idx_0.cif # Best model (CIF format)
├── pred.model_idx_1.cif # Second model
├── scores.json # Confidence scores
├── pae.npy # PAE matrix
└── plddt.npy # pLDDT values
Note: Chai-1 outputs CIF format. Convert to PDB if needed:
from Bio.PDB import MMCIFParser, PDBIO
parser = MMCIFParser()
structure = parser.get_structure("pred", "pred.model_idx_0.cif")
io = PDBIO()
io.set_structure(structure)
io.save("pred.model_idx_0.pdb")
Extracting metrics
import numpy as np
import json
# Load scores
with open('predictions/scores.json') as f:
scores = json.load(f)
plddt = np.load('predictions/plddt.npy')
pae = np.load('predictions/pae.npy')
print(f"pLDDT: {plddt.mean():.3f}")
print(f"pTM: {scores['ptm']:.3f}")
print(f"ipTM: {scores.get('iptm', 'N/A')}")
Use cases
Binder validation
# Predict complex with Chai
chai-lab predict --fasta binder_target.fasta --output val/
# Check ipTM > 0.5
scores = json.load(open('val/scores.json'))
if scores['iptm'] > 0.5:
print("Design passes validation")
Protein-ligand complex
# FASTA with SMILES
fasta = """
>protein
MKTA...
>ligand|smiles
CCO
"""
# Chai handles both protein and small molecules
Batch prediction
# Multiple sequences
for fasta in sequences/*.fasta; do
chai-lab predict \
--fasta "$fasta" \
--output "predictions/$(basename $fasta .fasta)"
done
Comparison with AF2
| Aspect | Chai-1 | AlphaFold2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSA required | No | Yes |
| Small molecules | Yes | No |
| DNA/RNA | Yes | Limited |
| Speed | Faster | Slower |
| Accuracy | Comparable | Reference |
Sample output
Successful run
$ chai-lab predict --fasta complex.fasta --output predictions/
[INFO] Loading Chai-1 model...
[INFO] Running inference...
[INFO] Saved 5 models to predictions/
predictions/scores.json:
{
"ptm": 0.82,
"iptm": 0.71,
"ranking_score": 0.76
}
What good output looks like:
- pTM: > 0.7 (confident global structure)
- ipTM: > 0.5 (confident interface, > 0.7 for high confidence)
- CIF files with reasonable atom positions
Decision tree
Should I use Chai?
│
├─ What are you predicting?
│ ├─ Protein-protein complex → Chai ✓ or ColabFold
│ ├─ Protein + small molecule → Chai ✓
│ ├─ Protein + DNA/RNA → Chai ✓
│ └─ Single protein only → Use ESMFold (faster)
│
├─ Need MSA?
│ ├─ No / want speed → Chai ✓
│ └─ Yes / want accuracy → ColabFold
│
└─ Priority?
├─ Highest accuracy → ColabFold with MSA
├─ Speed / no MSA → Chai ✓
└─ Ligand binding → Chai ✓
Typical performance
| Campaign Size | Time (A100) | Cost (Modal) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 complexes | 30-60 min | ~$10 | Standard validation |
| 500 complexes | 2-4h | ~$45 | Large campaign |
| 1000 complexes | 5-8h | ~$90 | Comprehensive |
Per-complex: ~20-40s for typical binder-target complex.
Verify
find predictions -name "*.cif" | wc -l # Should match input count
Troubleshooting
Low pLDDT: Increase num_trunk_recycles Low ipTM: Check chain order, interface region OOM errors: Use A100-80GB or reduce batch Slow prediction: Reduce num_diffn_timesteps
Error interpretation
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory | Complex too large | Use A100-80GB or split prediction |
KeyError: 'iptm' | Single chain predicted | Ensure FASTA has multiple chains |
ValueError: invalid SMILES | Malformed ligand | Validate SMILES with RDKit |
torch.cuda.OutOfMemoryError | GPU exhausted | Reduce num_diffn_timesteps to 100 |
Next: protein-qc for filtering and ranking.