agentsclimarketplace

Agent skills audit

Skill aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/skills/agent-skills-audit

Run a two-pass, multidisciplinary code audit led by a tie-breaker lead, combining security, performance, UX, DX, and edge-case analysis into one prioritized report with concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to audit code, perform a deep review, stress-test a codebase, or produce a risk-ranked remediation plan across backend, frontend, APIs, infra scripts, and product flows.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill agent-skills-audit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.5 KB, 846 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Audit Code

Overview

Run an expert-panel audit with strict sequencing and one unified output document. Produce findings first, sorted by severity, with file references, exploit/perf/flow impact, and actionable fixes.

Load references/audit-framework.md before starting the analysis.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer the following:

  • Audit scope: paths, modules, PR diff, or whole repository.
  • Product context: PRD/spec/user stories, trust boundaries, and critical business flows.
  • Runtime context: deployment model, queue/cron/background jobs, traffic profile, data sensitivity, and abuse assumptions.
  • Constraints: timeline, acceptable risk, and preferred remediation style.

If product context is missing, state assumptions explicitly and continue.

Team Roles

Use exactly these roles:

  • Security expert
  • Performance expert
  • UX expert
  • DX expert
  • Edge case master
  • Tie-breaker team lead

The tie-breaker lead resolves conflicts, prioritizes issues, and produces the final single report.

Workflow

Follow this sequence every time:

  1. Build Context Read code + product flows. Identify assets, entry points, high-risk operations, privileged actions, external dependencies, and "failure hurts" journeys.

  2. Build Invariant Coverage Matrix Before specialist pass 1, map critical invariants to every mutating path (HTTP routes, webhooks, async jobs, scripts):

  • Data-link invariants: multi-table relationships that must remain consistent.
  • Auth lifecycle invariants: disable/revoke semantics for sessions/tokens/API keys.
  • Input/transport invariants: validation, content-type policy, body-size/parse behavior.
  • Shape invariants: trees/graphs must reject cycles where applicable. Treat missing parity across equivalent paths as a finding candidate.
  1. Pass 1 Specialist Reviews Run role-specific analysis in this order:
  • Security
  • Performance
  • UX
  • DX
  • Edge case master Capture findings using the schema in references/audit-framework.md.
  1. Tie-Breaker Reconciliation Resolve disagreements:
  • Decide whether contested items are true issues.
  • Set severity and confidence.
  • Remove duplicates and merge overlapping findings.
  1. Cross-Review Pass 2 After edge-case findings, rerun specialists:
  • Security/Performance/UX/DX reassess prior findings and new edge-triggered scenarios.
  • Edge case master performs a final pass on residual risk after proposed mitigations.
  1. Final Report Publish one document from the tie-breaker lead with:
  • Findings first (ordered by severity, then blast radius, then exploitability).
  • Open questions/assumptions.
  • Remediation plan with priority, owner type, and verification tests.
  • Short executive summary at the end.

Quality Bar

Enforce these requirements:

  • Use concrete evidence with file references and line numbers where available.
  • Include reproduction steps for security/performance/edge findings when feasible.
  • Prefer actionable fixes over abstract advice.
  • Separate confirmed defects from speculative risks.
  • Mark confidence for each finding.
  • Run a cross-route consistency sweep: equivalent endpoints/jobs must enforce equivalent invariants.
  • For each High/Critical finding, include at least one focused regression test/check.

Safety and Policy Guardrails

Apply these guardrails while auditing:

  • Do not provide operational abuse instructions or exploit weaponization details.
  • Evaluate manipulative UX patterns as legal/trust/reputation risk, not as recommended growth tactics.
  • Prioritize user safety, system integrity, and maintainable engineering outcomes.

Output Format

Follow this response structure:

  1. Findings List only validated issues. Use the finding schema in references/audit-framework.md.

  2. Open Questions / Assumptions State missing context that could change priority or validity.

  3. Change Summary Summarize high-impact remediation themes in a few lines.

  4. Suggested Verification List focused tests/checks to confirm each major fix.

Runtime Heuristics

When the target stack is Bun + SQLite, apply the runtime-specific checklist in references/audit-framework.md (Runtime-Specific Heuristics (Bun + SQLite)) before finalizing findings.

What ships with it: 6 files

13.1 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable

.clawhub/

agents/

references/

scripts/

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most design frontend skills give in 846 tokens

Counted across 1,179 of the 2,086 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Commit to a bold aesthetic directionin 31 of 1179, across 24 files
  • Prefer component composition over inheritancein 28 of 1179, across 14 files
  • Animate only transform and opacity propertiesin 27 of 1179, across 22 files
  • Memoize expensive computations with useMemoin 26 of 1179, across 13 files
  • Use semantic HTML elementsin 24 of 1179, across 23 files
  • Virtualize long lists for performancein 21 of 1179, across 10 files
  • Use CSS variables for design tokensin 20 of 1179, across 14 files
  • Implement loading, empty, and error statesin 20 of 1179
  • Lazy load heavy components with Suspensein 19 of 1179, across 8 files
  • Respect prefers-reduced-motion media queriesin 18 of 1179, across 10 files
  • Prioritize CSS-only animations for HTMLin 18 of 1179, across 16 files
  • Use compound components for related UI elementsin 18 of 1179, across 7 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Load the audit framework before starting analysis
  • Collect audit scope and product context
  • Map critical invariants to every mutating path
  • Run specialist reviews in the specified order
  • Resolve conflicts using the tie-breaker lead
  • Perform a cross-review pass after edge-case findings

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.