Code review
Skill a5c-ai/babysitter/library/methodologies/rpikit/skills/code-review
Babysitter enforces obedience on agentic workforces and enables them to manage extremely complex tasks and workflows through deterministic, hallucination-free self-orchestration
npx -y skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill code-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Structured code quality assessment with Conventional Comments format, scaled review depth, and soft-gating verdicts preserving user autonomy.
SKILL.md
1.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
- When reviewing code changes before merge
- As part of the /review-code command
Process
- Identify modified files via git
- Assess change magnitude for review depth
- Execute 9-step review: context, correctness, design, testing, security flags, operations, maintainability
- Synthesize findings in standardized report
- Deliver verdict with rationale
Review Depth Scaling
- Under 200 lines: full detail review
- 200-1000 lines: focused review on critical areas
- Over 1000 lines: architectural-level review only
Verdicts
- APPROVE: Ready for security review
- APPROVE WITH NITS: Non-blocking suggestions only
- REQUEST CHANGES: Blocking issues exist (user may override)
Key Rules
- Provide specific file paths and line numbers
- Include at least one positive comment per review
- Use Conventional Comments format with decorations
- Explain reasoning, not just observations
- Limit critical issues to top 5 per category
- Reviews are soft gates preserving user autonomy
Tool Use
Invoke via babysitter process: methodologies/rpikit/rpikit-review