Code review patterns

Skill a5c-ai/babysitter/library/methodologies/cc10x/skills/code-review-patterns

Babysitter enforces obedience on agentic workforces and enables them to manage extremely complex tasks and workflows through deterministic, hallucination-free self-orchestration

Install

npx -y skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill code-review-patterns

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.

SKILL.md

1.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command)
Authentication and authorization patterns
Secrets handling (no hardcoded credentials)
Input validation and sanitization

Quality (weight: 25%)

Naming conventions and consistency
Code structure (SRP, cohesion, coupling)
Error handling completeness
Type safety (no any escapes)

Performance (weight: 20%)

Algorithmic complexity (flag O(n^2) or worse)
Resource and memory leaks
Database query efficiency (N+1)
Caching opportunities

Maintainability (weight: 25%)

Documentation (JSDoc/TSDoc for public APIs)
Test coverage adequacy
Readability (function length, nesting depth)
Tech debt markers (TODO, FIXME)

Confidence Gating

Only report issues with confidence >= 80%
Empty catch blocks are always critical (100% confidence)
Classify: critical, high, medium, low
Include actionable remediation for each issue

Router Contract

Every review must produce: STATUS, BLOCKING, REQUIRES_REMEDIATION, issue counts.

When to Use

Code review step in BUILD workflow
Fix review in DEBUG workflow
Full REVIEW workflow

Agents Used

code-reviewer (primary consumer)
silent-failure-hunter (error handling dimension)