agentsclimarketplace

Database documentation

Skill a-tokyo/agent-skills/skills/database-documentation

🧠 AI Agent skills for LLMs and AI Agents - Claude, Codex, Cursor etc.

Install
npx -y skills add a-tokyo/agent-skills --skill database-documentation

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 14 stars14 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Generate grounded-and-verified, engine-agnostic database documentation that reaches 100% parity with the real schema. Introspects the LIVE database as ground truth and cross-validates it against ORM models, migrations, generated types, seeds, and application queries, then proves completeness by diffing the docs back against the database. Produces ER diagrams (mermaid), per-table data dictionaries, and a machine-readable schema.json. Works with PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, and SQLite across any ORM (Prisma, TypeORM, Drizzle, Sequelize, Knex, Django, Rails) or raw SQL. Use when asked to document a database, produce an ERD or data dictionary, write db/schema docs, audit schema drift, or refresh existing DB docs.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

13.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

database-documentation

Document a database so completely and accurately that the docs are provably the schema, not a plausible guess at it. A half-correct schema doc is worse than none: people trust it and write broken code.

The one principle: grounded AND verified

Every statement in the output must be:

  • grounded β€” traceable to a concrete source, preferring the live database (introspection of the system catalog). ORM models, migrations, generated types, and seeds are claims about the database, not the database; the catalog is what actually runs.
  • verified β€” confirmed by re-introspecting the live database and diffing it against the generated docs until the diff is empty or every remaining difference is explicitly justified. Never write "documentation is complete" β€” instead make the diff empty and show it.

A frontier model left to itself reads the ORM, writes confident prose, and ships an incomplete and partly hallucinated schema (missed check-constraint enums, wrong ON DELETE, omitted legacy tables, invented columns). This skill exists to defeat exactly that. Two mechanisms do it: (1) the live DB is the oracle, and (2) judgment is never one agent's call β€” independent adversaries hunt for what one pass misses.

Scope (v1): relational/SQL only

Targets PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, SQLite. If you detect a document store (MongoDB) or graph database, say so and stop on that store β€” do not emit relational docs for it (silent mis-documentation is the worst outcome). Note it as out of scope rather than guessing.

Workflow

Run these phases in order. Each names its exit artifact. Keep all scratch (intermediate extractions, the working CSM) in a single .database-documentation/ scratch dir or your platform scratchpad β€” the only durable deliverables are the docs and schema.json.

Phase 0 β€” Discover (read-only)

  1. Fingerprint the engine + version and the ORM(s): look for schema.prisma, *.entity.ts + datasource, drizzle.config.*, knexfile.* + migrations/, Django models.py, Rails schema.rb, raw SQL DDL. Find the engine + version from the datasource/provider, docker-compose.yml image tags, and connection URLs in .env*.
  2. Find the live-DB reachability path, trying in this order and stopping at the first that works: a connected DB MCP server β†’ docker compose exec / docker exec into the DB container (read creds from compose env) β†’ a local DB CLI (psql/mysql/sqlcmd/sqlite3) against host:port from .env. Prove it with one trivial query (SELECT 1, list tables) before continuing. If the DB is down but a compose file defines it, offer to start it. Never print credentials: treat passwords/DSNs read from .env/compose as secrets β€” keep them only in the command you execute, and redact them (password=***) in anything you show or write to the docs.
  3. Inventory every other surface: migrations dir (+count), generated client/*.d.ts, seeds/fixtures, and grep the app for raw SQL / query-builder calls. Note existing docs/db/ β€” if present this is a refresh: load it to diff for drift and to match house style.
  4. Announce the tier you reached (see Degradation ladder) so the reader knows the confidence level.

Exit: a short discovery note β€” engine, ORM, reachability tier, the exact verified live-DB command, surface paths.

Phase 1 β€” Extract every surface (parallel where possible)

Extract each available surface independently into the Canonical Schema Model shape (see references/csm-contract.md). On platforms with subagents, run one extractor per surface in parallel, and do not let them see each other's output β€” independent agreement is real evidence; shared context is groupthink.

Object-class checklist β€” extract EVERY class; skipping one is the most common failure. Copy this list and confirm each is present in schema.json with a live count:

  • tables Β· [ ] columns (type+nullable+default+comment) Β· [ ] primary keys Β· [ ] foreign keys (+ON DELETE/UPDATE)
  • unique constraints Β· [ ] check constraints Β· [ ] indexes (+partial/expression) Β· [ ] enums (+values)
  • sequences Β· [ ] triggers Β· [ ] views (+definition) Β· [ ] routines (functions/procedures)

Sequences, triggers, and routines are routinely forgotten because they are not columns β€” extract them explicitly. Capture view / trigger / routine bodies in full and verbatim β€” never abbreviate, summarize, or elide with ...; a truncated definition is an incomplete (wrong) doc. schema.json.enums = DB-NATIVE enum types only. A string column with a CHECK (col IN (...)) goes under that table's check_constraints (not enums); an app-level-only value set goes in the column description marked "app-enforced". Putting a non-native enum in enums is a hallucination against the live schema.

  • Live introspection (authoritative). Read the full catalog. See references/introspection-postgres.md for the exact Postgres queries (and the MySQL/MSSQL/SQLite equivalents); they cover tables, columns (type with length/precision, nullability, default, identity, generated, collation, comment), primary keys, foreign keys with ON DELETE/ON UPDATE, unique + check constraints, indexes (partial predicates and expression columns included), enums, domains, sequences, views/matviews, triggers, routines. Do NOT shell out to any benchmark/oracle script β€” write and run the introspection yourself.
  • ORM models β†’ CSM (intent + descriptions; per-ORM notes in references/).
  • Migrations β†’ fold them in timestamp order to reconstruct final state (do not eyeball 200 files).
  • Generated types / seeds / app queries β†’ corroborate; the app-query scan catches tables/columns used but absent from the ORM (legacy tables).

Exit: one partial CSM per surface.

Phase 2 β€” Reconcile to one CSM (precedence + drift)

Merge into a master CSM, keying tables by physical DB name. Precedence:

  1. Live DB present β†’ it wins, full stop. Any surface that disagrees produces a drift finding (recorded in issues/), never a silent edit to the docs. The docs describe the live database.
  2. No live DB β†’ consensus of migrations βŠ• ORM (migrations win structure, ORM wins intent); flag conflicts.

Tag each object's confidence: verified (live-confirmed) / consensus / single-source / conflict. Where you have a live DB, cross-check it against itself via two methods (e.g. information_schema vs pg_catalog) β€” the oracle must agree with itself before overruling other surfaces.

Exit: master CSM + a discrepancies list.

Phase 3 β€” Generate docs + schema.json

Write all output into one dedicated docs directory β€” never scatter files across the repo. Default to docs/db/; if Phase 0 found an existing DB-docs directory (e.g. docs/db/, docs/database/, docs/schema/, or wherever the repo already keeps them), write there instead to match house style. Create the directory if absent. Render the CSM (a pure function of it) into it, matching the template in references/output-template.md, sized to the schema:

  • ≀ ~15 tables β†’ a single docs/db/DATABASE.md (stats header, one mermaid ERD, per-table sections, an Issues section).
  • larger β†’ under docs/db/: README.md (index + stats) + ONBOARDING.md + diagrams/<domain>.md per domain (mermaid erDiagram with all columns+types + relationship lines, then per-table sections) + diagrams/full-erd.md (table-level only, so it stays renderable) + tables/entity-reference.md + issues/README.md.

Emit schema.json into that same directory (docs/db/schema.json).

Per-table section: 1–2 sentence evidence-based description, a Column | Type | Nullable | Default | Description table, then Indexes: and Foreign Keys: (with ON DELETE). Partition domains by ORM module/folder β†’ name prefix β†’ FK clustering, with a Legacy/Misc catch-all. The schema.json follows the shape in references/csm-contract.md.

Phase 4 β€” Prove parity (the verified half)

This is not optional and not a vibe. A claimed "looks complete" is worthless. Weak models in particular will assert parity they did not achieve; do not trust the assertion, run the numbers.

  1. Count gate (early tripwire). For EVERY object class, count it in the live DB and compare to the count in your schema.json. The count query MUST select the exact same population your extraction and the CSM define β€” otherwise a correct doc fails the gate and you will "fix" it by hallucinating. Two rules that bite on every real database: indexes exclude PK/unique-constraint-backing ones, and routines/objects exclude extension-owned ones (pg_depend.deptype='e'). Use the population-matched count queries in references/introspection-postgres.md ("Count-gate queries") β€” NOT a naive count(*), and never a lossy view (e.g. information_schema.check_constraints is polluted with NOT NULL rows; reltuples may be -1). Print a class | live | documented | match? table. A mismatch means investigate β€” it may be a real omission, or your count query selecting the wrong population. Counts matching is necessary, not sufficient (equal counts hide swapped types / wrong ON DELETE).
  2. Identity-diff (the actual proof). Re-introspect fresh and diff identities and attributes, not just counts, over every class: tables, columns (name/type/nullable/default), PKs, FKs (+on_delete), uniques, checks, indexes (+partial/expression), enums (+values), views, triggers, routines, sequences.
  3. For every difference: fix the docs, or justify it (e.g. "live-only object listed under Drift").
  4. Repeat until the count table matches AND the identity-diff is empty or fully justified.
  5. Write a Parity Report (in README.md or issues/): the per-class count table + an explicit "0 undocumented, 0 invented". Only write "verified" when the identity-diff (step 2) is empty β€” not on a count match alone. With no live DB, run the diff against the consensus CSM and label every output file "consensus parity (UNVERIFIED against live DB)".

Phase 5 β€” Adversarial review (β‰₯3 independent, never one)

Because the agent doing the judging is itself a frontier model with the same blind spots as the agent that wrote the docs, a single review rubber-stamps. Convene β‰₯3 context-walled adversaries, each in a distinct session with a must-find-fault mandate and a different lens:

  • omission hunter β€” sample live tables: is each present with every column? Are legacy tables, every enum/CHECK, every index and FK documented?
  • hallucination hunter β€” does every documented object/type/default/ON DELETE/description trace to a real source? Flag anything invented.
  • correctness hunter β€” do types, nullability, and FK cardinality match the live DB exactly?

Their union feeds another generation pass. Wherever judgment is needed, it is a panel decision.

Degradation ladder (announce your tier)

TierHaveConfidence
T1live DB + parallel subagents + adversariesverified, provable
T2live DB, single agentverified, sequential
T3no live DB, subagentsconsensus, unverified
T4no live DB, single agentconsensus, unverified
T5one static surface onlylow β€” prominent "UNVERIFIED β€” no live DB" banner

Subagents, MCP, and docker are optimizations, never requirements β€” the same phases run inline without them. Never fabricate data you could not read: missing is flagged, not guessed.

References

  • references/csm-contract.md β€” the schema.json shape (the verifiable output contract).
  • references/introspection-postgres.md β€” exact catalog queries per engine.
  • references/output-template.md β€” the human doc shape to reproduce.
  • references/hard-cases.md β€” enums (native/CHECK/app), JSON columns, polymorphic relations, soft-deletes, composite keys, partial/expression indexes, views, multi-schema, citext/collation, legacy tables.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.