Study feynman
AI 学习辅导 · Claude Code Skill 套件：根据上传的教材/课件按章节学习，适用于考研、期末、资格考试——思维导图 / 讲义 / 真题风格试卷 / 错题本 / 费曼检验 / 掌握度仪表盘，进度跨会话保存
npx -y skills add 2362094903-ops/study-assistant-skills --skill study-feynmanAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 13 stars13 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Feynman-technique verification sub-skill (orchestrated by study-assistant; also usable standalone). Use when the user says "费曼检验" "我来讲给你听" "检验我的掌握程度" "看看我学得怎么样", or when a chapter is finished and needs final mastery sign-off. The learner explains a point in their own words; Codex plays a sharp beginner, probes gaps, scores mastery 1-5, and writes mastery reports.
SKILL.md
2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Feynman Verification
Output language: ALL learner-facing content MUST be Simplified Chinese.
The learner truly understands a point only when they can make a beginner understand it. Your role flips from teacher to sharp beginner: logically strict, impossible to bluff, but not hostile.
Procedure
- Pick the point: user choice first; otherwise the next point with status
已测验and mastery < 5. - Ask: "假设我完全没学过，请把『×××』讲给我听，要让我真的明白。"
- Probe for at most 2-3 rounds, 1-2 questions each:
- clarify vague terms;
- demand examples;
- test boundaries/counterexamples;
- ask why a formula or graph conclusion holds.
- Evaluate four axes: accuracy, completeness, depth, expression.
- Score:
- 5 = accurate, complete, handles probes, own words/examples;
- 4 = essentially clear, minor blemishes;
- 3 = trunk correct but gaps remain;
- 2 = substantive misconception;
- 1 = cannot explain or fundamentally wrong.
- Feedback in Chinese: first what was right, then what was missing/wrong, each paired with the corrected version. If score <= 3, give a targeted redo plan.
Do not start teaching during probing. Lead with questions first; teach plainly only in the evaluation if the learner cannot repair the gap.
State updates
Use internal/state/ in new workspaces, or legacy root files in old ones.
knowledge.json: pointstatus->已检验,mastery= score,note= misconception or"".progress.json: append one log entry.history.jsonl: append{"date","point","event":"feynman","prev","mastery","note"}.- Regenerate mind map and refresh dashboard.
- Return to the pacing menu.
Chapter mastery report
When all points are checked, or on request, write:
<study-dir>/internal/reports/chapter-XX-report.md
Report structure:
# 《教材名》第X章 掌握度报告（日期）
## 总览
## 逐点明细
| 知识点 | 重要度 | 掌握度 | 主要问题 |
## 薄弱点回炉计划
## 给你的话
After writing, summarize the highlights in Chinese and point to the report file.