Engineering guidelines
一组可独立装载的 Agent / Claude Code Skills:编码行为准则、横切规范、多仓脚手架与多 agent 代码审计
npx -y skills add 0xkangl/skills --skill engineering-guidelinesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when writing or modifying any code, before implementation — enforces think-before-coding, simplicity-first, surgical-changes, goal-driven execution, and root-cause reasoning.
SKILL.md
3.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Engineering Guidelines
LLM/agent coding behavior guidelines. Applies to all modules and development tools.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- Read relevant files, understand the architecture, find existing implementations.
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- If requirements are ambiguous, ask all clarifying questions at once before acting — no partial starts.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- Don't duplicate existing abstractions.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that your changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
5. Reasoning Standards
Analyze from root cause, not surface symptoms.
- First principles: Trace to root cause; don't patch surface symptoms.
- Facts over feelings: Correct mistakes directly, list options, recommend the best one.
- When challenged: Validate from requirements first, not from pressure — if the premise is flawed, push back with a question.
- When evaluating solutions: Think in industry-standard, production-grade terms. Ignore implementation time cost; weigh operational cost.
6. Code Style
- Comment language follows the project's convention, default to simplified Chinese.
- Keep explanations concise — no preamble.
After Coding Checklist
- Imports are correct and unused ones (caused by your changes) are removed.
- Types are correct.
- Edge cases are handled.
- No unrelated code was touched.
- No existing APIs were broken.