agentsclimarketplace

Winning pitch deck

Skill 0xbenbottle/winning-pitch-deck

Skill for crafting 3-min founder pitch decks. Based on the DePitch framework shared during Superteam Canada workshop

Install
npx -y skills add 0xbenbottle/winning-pitch-deck

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Craft or review a 3-minute founder pitch deck and speaker script using the DePitch framework. Use this skill whenever the user wants to build, draft, review, roast, tighten, or rehearse a pitch deck / pitch video / demo-day pitch / hackathon submission pitch / startup-competition pitch — even if they don't say the words "pitch deck" (e.g., "help me pitch my project", "I have 3 minutes to convince judges", "prep my Colosseum Frontier submission", "review my deck"). The framework is anchored in Colosseum Frontier conventions (3-min pitch video + 3-min demo video) but works for any short founder pitch to investors or judges.

SKILL.md

9.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Winning Pitch Deck (DePitch framework)

This skill helps a founder build or review a 3-minute pitch deck that wins hackathon / startup-competition judges and, downstream, investors. The framework is by Sofian (DePitch Academy / Legends.fun) and has shipped 16 Colosseum wins, 3 accelerator entries, and $2.5M+ raised across teams that used it.

The core insight

"Interest is earned every 30 seconds. Your slides are support for your message — you are the spotlight. One slide = one message. If you sell the problem, you don't need to sell the solution."

Most founders lose the pitch before they start because they pitch a concept instead of a scalable business, rush to show everything instead of leaving the judge wanting more, and forget that the judge is watching hundreds of pitches in a row with a thumb hovering over "next".

When to use this skill

Use it proactively any time the user signals they're preparing a pitch. Phrases that should trigger:

  • "help me build a pitch deck" / "craft my pitch" / "write my pitch script"
  • "Colosseum Frontier", "Solana hackathon", "Colosseum submission", "frontier pitch"
  • "review / roast / critique my deck", "what's wrong with my pitch"
  • "I have 3 minutes to pitch", "demo day", "startup competition", "YC-style pitch"
  • "how do I pitch [my project]" — even without the word "deck"
  • Submitting a founder pitch video (script + slides are the same problem)

Don't wait for the user to say "pitch deck" literally. If they're preparing to pitch, use the skill.

Two modes — detect which one first

Ask the user once, if it's not obvious: "Do you want me to help you build this from scratch, or review a deck/script you already have?"

Build mode

The user has a product/idea but no deck yet. Workflow:

  1. Run the founder interview (see references/founder-interview.md) — ask all the questions up-front in one batched message so they can answer asynchronously, then wait for answers before drafting.
  2. Draft a slide-by-slide outline applying references/slide-by-slide.md.
  3. Write a speaker script with timing marks (see "Output format" below).
  4. Self-check the draft against references/failure-patterns.md and references/review-rubric.md before showing the user. Fix anything that fails the check.
  5. Deliver outline + script + a delivery-rehearsal checklist from references/delivery-10-techniques.md.

Review mode

The user has a deck, script, or video/transcript. Workflow:

  1. Read what they have.
  2. Score against references/review-rubric.md and tag which of the 5 failure-patterns.md they're hitting.
  3. Return top 3–5 prioritized fixes, not a full rewrite. Rewriting everything burns trust and buries the high-impact changes. Only rewrite sections the user asks you to.
  4. For each fix: name the slide, quote the current version, write the suggested version, explain the why in one sentence.

The framework (four movements, ~15 slide types)

The pitch moves through four beats. Slide count is flexible — one slide one message, so splitting is fine — but the order is load-bearing.

BeatSlidesPurpose
ConceptIntro → Problem → Value Proposition → Features → DemoMake the judge feel the pain, then show the product working
BusinessMarket → (Trends) → (Competition) → Business Model → Traction → (Partners)Prove this is a scalable business, not a concept
GrowthGrowth Strategy → RoadmapShow the engine to reach users + what ships next
CloseTeam → Conclusion + CTAProve you'll deliver, leave them something to do

Slides in parentheses are optional — include only if they add signal.

Details, winning examples, and per-slide "what to avoid": references/slide-by-slide.md.

Hard rules (non-negotiable)

These come directly from the framework. Violating them is the single biggest predictor of a losing pitch.

  1. One slide = one message. Titles 3–4 words. Words are the killer of your deck.
  2. Tense discipline. Present or past tense everywhere. Future tense is allowed only on the roadmap slide. Ban all conditionals: "trying to", "hope to", "aim to", "would", "should", "could". These halve the trust signal instantly.
  3. Ban "obviously" and "of course." They kill the surprise for the listener — and surprise is how you hook attention.
  4. Demo appears before 2:00. A demo at 2:10 or 2:20 in a 3-minute pitch is too late — the judge is already leaving. 20–30 seconds, no background music, live through one main feature.
  5. Business model slide is non-negotiable. Skip it and you're pitching a concept, not a business.
  6. Traction = 3 real metrics. Prefer revenue > growth % > users > waitlist. Do not use X/Twitter followers as traction — judges and VCs read that as a red flag.
  7. Team slide = one outstanding achievement, not bios. Highlight the thing that proves "we can deliver this again." Listing "CEO / CTO / Head of BD" is the default and costs you the slide.
  8. Every transition between slides is scripted. "And that's exactly what we're solving." "So how do we make money?" The pitch is one continuous funnel, not a slide deck read aloud.
  9. End with a CTA, not "thank you." Give the judge a next step: watch longer demo, book a call, try the product, scan the QR to our Legends.fund / product page.
  10. Embed something memorable. One quotable line the judge can repeat to another judge in the hallway. Without it you're forgettable.

Output format

When building, return three artifacts in one response, in this order:

1. Slide-by-slide outline

Markdown with one heading per slide. Under each slide:

  • On-slide content — exactly what appears on the slide (title, sub-items, image notes)
  • What the judge should feel — one line, why this slide exists
  • Transition into the next slide — the sentence the founder says as they click

2. Speaker script with timing marks

A single script block with [0:00], [0:20], [0:45], etc. timing marks. Target total runtime at bottom. Use the founder's actual voice from the interview answers — write how they talk, not corporate-speak. Mark transition sentences explicitly so the founder can rehearse the glue.

Aim for ~150 words per minute spoken (so ~450 words for a 3-min pitch). Err on the shorter side — Sofian's advice: pitch a teaser, not a full movie.

3. Delivery rehearsal checklist

Pull from references/delivery-10-techniques.md. Tailor it to this deck specifically (e.g., flag tense violations in the draft so the founder can catch them when they rehearse, note which slide carries the hook, etc.).

Colosseum Frontier specifics

If the user mentions Colosseum Frontier, the Solana hackathon, or the accelerator, layer these on:

  • Submission = 3-min pitch video + 3-min demo video. Two separate videos. This skill handles the pitch video; the demo video is a longer walkthrough of the product.
  • Judges are busy VCs/founders/ecosystem partners watching hundreds of pitches. They have a bias: they fund startups that can raise multiple rounds and reach high valuations. Pitch fundability, not just product.
  • Acceptance rate into the accelerator is reportedly lower than Y Combinator. ~10 teams out of thousands make it to the accelerator with $250k pre-seed.
  • Legends.fun QR trick: the user can put a QR code on the closing slide linking to their Legends.fund page, so judges reviewing weeks later see current traction, not submission-day traction. Strong signal of "still building".
  • Previous winners are public on the Colosseum site. Recommend the founder watch 2–3 winning pitches in their category before finalizing.
  • Interview follow-up. If they pass the video filter, the interview tests solidity of business model, moat ("why can't anyone copy you tomorrow?"), and grit ("is this a company or a hackathon project?"). Flag this to the founder so they start preparing now, not later.

Reference files

Load these as needed — don't front-load all of them.

  • references/slide-by-slide.md — per-slide guidance with winning-deck examples (Surf Cache, Nomu, Spend, CFL, Loot Go). Load this when drafting or reviewing specific slides.
  • references/delivery-10-techniques.md — the 10 delivery techniques (hook, teaser, tenses, rehearsal, stage, etc.). Load at the end of build mode and always in review mode.
  • references/failure-patterns.md — the 5 reasons pitches fail. Use as a self-check before showing the user anything.
  • references/founder-interview.md — structured interview questions for build mode. Load at start of build mode.
  • references/review-rubric.md — scoring checklist for review mode. Load at start of review mode.
  • assets/deck-outline-template.md — fillable outline the user can copy into their slide tool. Offer this at the end.

A note on tone

Sofian's framework is direct and a little tough — he'll tell a founder their team slide is boring, their demo is too late, their tense is wrong. Mirror that. Founders reviewing a pitch are in the last week before a deadline; they need honest feedback, not compliment-sandwich feedback. Be specific, quote their words, give the fix.

The goal isn't to make the founder feel good about their draft. It's to get them into the top 10% of submissions.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most slides presentations skills give

Counted across 568 of the 571 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06

  • include a visual element on every slidein 52 of 568, across 21 files
  • put one idea per slidein 50 of 568, across 42 files
  • state the design approach before writing codein 38 of 568, across 8 files
  • validate XML immediately after each editin 37 of 568, across 7 files
  • rasterize gradients and icons as PNG images before referencing themin 37 of 568, across 7 files
  • generate and inspect thumbnails to validate layoutin 37 of 568, across 7 files
  • commit to a single visual motif across every slidein 37 of 568, across 12 files
  • use web-safe fonts onlyin 36 of 568, across 7 files
  • keep 0.5 inch minimum marginsin 35 of 568, across 9 files
  • use two-column layout for slides with charts or tablesin 34 of 568, across 5 files
  • save a template inventory analysis to a filein 33 of 568, across 4 files
  • use subagents to visually inspect rendered slidesin 33 of 568, across 9 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • batch all interview questions in one message
  • ask whether to build or review
  • load the founder interview at the start of build mode
  • load the review rubric at the start of review mode
  • return prioritized fixes not a full rewrite
  • quote the current version for each fix

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.